-
Mirza’s Denial of I`sa’s Descent
Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (1839-1908) of Qadiyan, in his early life believed
in the reappearance of I`sa that is why we find in his early writings,
references, which support this belief and support it.
In Barahin-I-Ahmadiya, commenting on the following Quranic verse:
‘He is who has sent his messenger with guidance and the religion
of truth, that he may make it superior to all religions, and Allah is all
sufficient. (AL-FATH 48/28)
Mirza says, "This verse at this stage gives us an indication of the advent
of Jesus in his full glory. In other words if the people are not going
to accept the soft-natured, gracious and righteous approach and they reject
that the truth has become manifest through arguments, clear proofs and
clear verses, then, (they should know) that truth will dawn when God will
make use of harshness, heavy handedness and strength against the evil doers
and Jesus will descend upon this earth in all his all conquering magnificence."
(Barahin-I-Ahmadiyyah, Vol. 1. P601)
He also admitted that the predictions of I`sa’s
Second Coming were of a first degree and order, which everyone had admitted
unanimously.
He says, "The manner in which the predictions have been written in the
Sihah
(the
most authentic collection of the Hadith) no prediction is proven to be
equal to it. It enjoys the highest status of tawatur. The Gospel
also endorses it." (Izalah-I-Awham. Vol. 2 P400)
In a later stage of his career Mirza declared to be the promised Messiah
and was therefore confronted with the need to present proof in order to
validate his claim. He therefore resorted to first, denying the miraculous
Second Coming of I`sa (Jesus)
by innovating the unknown history of I`sa (Jesus) fleeing to Kashmir in
order to escape the punishment of crucifixion, where he lived for many
years, died there and was buried there.
Mirza says,
"The belief regarding the descent of Jesus is not a part of our faith,
nor is it one of the fundamentals of religion. But it is one prediction
among hundreds, which has no relationship with the reality of Islam." (Izalah-I-Awham.
Vol. 2 P170)
In the above-mentioned quotation Mirza has denied the belief of Jesus’
descent to be an article of faith. He has also denied and refuted it to
be a unanimous agreement in the following statement,
"If by unanimity, the unanimity of the companions of the holy prophet
is meant, then this is an accusation on them. They had no knowledge of
this new belief that Jesus will come to the world a Second time. After
all, if this was their belief, then why did they shed tears (on the death
of the holy prophet) and agreed with the subject matter of this Quranic
verse, ‘Muhammad
is no more than a messenger (of God). Many messengers passed before him."
(Haqiqat al-Wahy, P34)
The Hadiths on I`sa’s descent have been narrated by more than thirty companions
of the prophet Muhammad (sallahu alayhi wasallam). This itself is evident
upon the companions’ unanimous agreement, which has been denied by Mirza
and he has tried to support his claim by baseless reasoning such as why
they shed tears upon the death of the prophet Muhammad (sallahu alayhi
wasallam). Mirza’s denial took its full expression in his last works like
the last volume of the Brahin-I-Ahmadiyyah, which was written a year before
his death.
He says in this,
"In spite of such an explicit verse of the Quran, how is it possible
to accept that Jesus Christ lived for 2000 years, or more, for an indefinite
period, in the heavens, instead of the earth. It amounts to a nullification
of the Quran." (Damimah Barahin-I-Ahmadiyyah, Vol. 5, P394)
Mirza Ghulam Ahmed used all the tools at his disposal to remove I`sa
from the scene, because he viewed Jesus as the one competing with him for
the position of Messiah. His following remark is a true testimony to this,
as he says,
"Now it is clear that when the Messiah has died, neither he can appear
after death nor has the Quran given any news of his coming to life again."
(Izalah-I-Awham P278)
Back to contents of Hazrat Isa
Copyright Inter-Islam 1998-2001 ©